Poststructuralism and Postmodernism in International Relations (2022)

  • Amin, A., & Palan, R. (2001). Towards a non-rationalist international political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 8(4), 559–577.

  • Amoore, L. (2009). Lines of sight: On the visualization of unknown futures. Citizenship Studies, 13(1), 17–30.

  • Amoore, L. (2013). The politics of possibility: Risk and security beyond probability. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • Amoore, L., & De Goede, M. (Eds.). (2008). Risk and the war on terror. New York: Routledge.

  • Ashley, R. K. (1987). The geopolitics of geopolitical space: Toward a critical social theory of international politics. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 12, 403–434.

  • Ashley, R. K. (1989). Living on border lines: Man, poststructuralism, and war. In J. Der Derian & M. J. Shapiro (Eds.), International/intertextual relations: Postmodern readings of world politics (pp. 259–313). New York: Lexington Books.

  • Ashley, R. K. (1996). The achievements of post-structuralism. In S. Smith, K. Booth, & M. Zalewski (Eds.), International theory: Positivism and beyond (pp. 240–253). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ashley, R. K., & Walker, R. B. J. (1990a). Conclusion: Reading dissidence/writing the discipline: Crisis and the question of sovereignty in international studies. International Studies Quarterly, 34, 367–416.

  • Ashley, R. K., & Walker, R. B. J. (1990b). Introduction: Speaking the language of exile: Dissident thought in international studies. International Studies Quarterly, 34, 259–268.

  • Bartelson, J. (1996). A genealogy of sovereignty. Cambridge, UK.: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bartelson, J. (2018). War in international thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • Bleiker, R. (2008). Postmodernism. In R. Devetak, A. Burke, & J. George (Eds.), An introduction to international relations: Australian perspectives (pp. 86–95). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bleiker, R. (2009). Aesthetics and world politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Brown, C. (1994). “Turtles all the way down”: Anti-foundationalism, critical theory and international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23(2), 213–236.

  • Burke, A. (2007). Beyond security, ethics and violence: War against the other. London: Routledge.

  • Burke, A. (2008). Postmodernism. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international relations (pp. 359–377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

  • Butler, J. (2007). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.

  • Callinicos, A. (1985). Postmodernism, post-structuralism, post-Marxism? Theory, Culture & Society, 2(3), 85–101.

  • Campbell, D. (1994). The deterritorialization of responsibility: Levinas, Derrida, and ethics after the end of philosophy. Alternatives: Global, Political, Local, 19(4), 455–484.

  • Campbell, D. (1998). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Campbell, D. (2002). Atrocity, memory, photography: Imagining the concentration camps of Bosnia. Journal of Human Rights, 1(1), 1–33.

  • Campbell, D. (2007). Poststructuralism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds.), International relations theory: Discipline and diversity (pp. 203–228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Campbell, D., & Dillon, M. (Eds.). (1993). The political subject of violence. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2018). Planetary crisis and the difficulty of being modern. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 46(3), 259–282.

  • Chaloupka, W. (1992). Knowing nukes: The politics and culture of the atom. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Chowdhry, G., & Nair, S. (Eds.). (2002). Power, postcolonialism and international relations: Reading race, gender and class. London: Routledge.

    (Video) Poststructuralism: WTF? Derrida, Deconstruction and Poststructuralist Theory Explained

  • Cochran, M. (1995). Postmodernism, ethics and international political theory. Review of International Studies, 21(3), 237–250.

  • Connolly, W. E. (1991). Democracy and territoriality. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 20(3), 463–484.

  • Connolly, W. E. (2005). Pluralism. Durham NC: Duke University Press.

  • Connolly, W. E. (2013). The fragility of things: Self-organizing processes, neoliberal fantasies, and democratic activism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • Coole, D. (2013). Agentic capacities and capacious historical materialism: Thinking with new materialisms in the political sciences. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41(3), 451–469.

  • Cooper, M. (2008). Life as surplus: Biotechnology and capitalism in the neoliberal era. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

  • Crush, J. (Ed.). (1995). Power of development. London: Routledge.

  • Cudworth, E., & Hobden, S. (2011). Posthuman international relations: Complexity, ecologism and global politics. London: Zed Books.

  • Cudworth, E., & Hobden, S. (2015). The posthuman way of war. Security Dialogue, 46, 513–529.

  • Culler, J. (1985). On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Dauphinée, E. (2007). The ethics of researching war: Looking for Bosnia. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

  • Davies, M. (2006). Everyday life in the global political economy. In M. DeGoede (Ed.), International political economy and poststructural politics (pp. 219–237). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Debrix, F., & Weber, C. (Eds.). (2003). Rituals of mediation: International politics and social meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • DeGoede, M. (2003). Beyond economism in international political economy. Review of International Studies, 29, 79–97.

  • DeGoede, M. (2004). Repoliticizing financial risk. Economy and Society, 33(2), 197–217.

  • DeGoede, M. (2005). Virtue, fortune, faith: A genealogy of finance. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • DeGoede, M. (Ed.). (2006). International political economy and poststructural politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Der Derian, J. (1990). The (s)pace of international relations: Simulation, surveillance, and speed. International Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 295–310.

  • Der Derian, J. (2009). Post-theory: The eternal return of ethics in international relations. In J. Der Derian (Ed.), Critical practices in international theory: Selected essays (pp. 190–209). London: Routledge.

  • Der Derian, J. (2009). Virtuos war: Mapping the military-industrial media-entertainment network. London: Routledge.

  • Devetak, R. (2005). Postmodernism. In S. Burchill, A. Linklater, R. Devetak, J. Donnelly, M. Paterson, C. Reus-Smit, & J. True (Eds.), Theories of international relations (pp. 161–187). New York: Palgrave.

  • Diez, T. (2004). Europe’s others and the return of geopolitics. Review of International Studies, 17, 319–335.

  • Dillon, M. (1996). Politics of security: Towards a political philosophy of continental thought. London: Routledge.

  • Dillon, M. (1999). The scandal of the refugee: Some reflections on the “inter” of international relations and continental thought. In D. Campbell & M. J. Shapiro (Eds.), Moral spaces: Rethinking ethics and world politics (pp. 92–124). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Dillon, M. (2000). Poststructuralism, complexity and poetics. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(5), 1–26.

  • Dillon, M. (2013). Deconstructing international politics. London: Routledge.

  • Dillon, M., & Neal, A. W. (Eds.). (2008). Foucault on politics, security, and war. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Duffield, M. (2007). Development, security, and unending war: Governing the world of the peoples. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    (Video) 7. Poststructuralism Approach

  • Edkins, J. (1999). Poststructuralism and international relations: Bringing the political back in. London: Lynne Rienner.

  • Edkins, J. (2000). Whose hunger? Concepts of famine, practices of aid. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Edkins, J. (2007). Poststructuralism. In M. Griffiths (Ed.), International relations theory for the twenty-first century: An introduction (pp. 88–98). London: Routledge.

  • Edkins, J. (2011). Missing: Persons and politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Edkins, J., & Kear, A. (Eds.). (2013). International politics and performance: Critical aesthetics and creative practice. New York: Routledge.

  • Escobar, A. (1992). Imagining a post-development era? Critical thought, development and social movements. Social Text, 31/32, 20–56.

  • Evans, B., & Reid, J. (2014). Resilient life: The art of living dangerously. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

  • Finlayson, A., & Valentine, J. (Eds.). (2005). Politics and post-structuralism: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction vol. I. New York: Vintage Books.

  • Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.

  • Foucault, M. (1997). Subject and power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984 (Vol. 3, pp. 326–348). New York: New York Press.

  • Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976. New York: Picador.

  • Frazer, E., & Hutchings, K. (2011). Virtuous violence and the politics of statecraft in Machiavelli, Clausewitz and Weber. Political Studies, 56, 59–73.

  • Gammon, E., & Palan, R. (2006). Libidinal international political economy. In M. DeGoede (Ed.), International political economy and poststructural politics (pp. 97–114). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • George, J. (1994). Discourses of global politics: A critical (re)introduction to international relations. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

  • George, J., & Campbell, D. (1990). Patterns of dissent and the celebration of difference: Critical social theory and international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 269–294.

  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political Economy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Glezos, S. (2012). The politics of speed: Capitalism, the state and war in an accelerating world. London: Routledge.

  • Gordon, C. (Ed.). (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 Michel Foucault. New York: Pantheon Books.

  • Gregory, D. (1989). Forward. In J. Der Derian & M. J. Shapiro (Eds.), International/intertextual relations: Postmodern readings of world politics (pp. ix–xi). New York: Lexington Books.

  • Hall, S. (1992). The West and the rest: Discourse and power. In S. Hall & B. Gieben (Eds.), Formations of Modernity (pp. 276–320). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

  • Halliday, F. (1996). The future of international relations: Fear and hopes. In S. Smith, K. Booth, & M. Zalewski (Eds.), International theory: Positivism and beyond (pp. 318–327). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hamati-Ataya, I. (2013). Reflectivity, reflexivity, reflexivism: IR’s “reflective turn”—and beyond. European Journal of International Relations, 19, 669–694.

  • Hansen, L. (2006). Security as practice: Discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. London: Routledge.

  • Hindess, B. (1996). Discourses of power: From Hobbes to Foucault. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Hozic, A. (2015). Letter from America (a Christmas letter to a Southern widow). Critical Studies on Security, 3(1), 107–111.

  • Jabri, V. (1998). Restyling the subject of responsibility in international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 27(3), 591–61

  • Jabri, V. (2007). War and the transformation of global politics. Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    (Video) Structuralism vs. Post-Structuralism

  • Jarvis, D. S. L. (2000). International relations and the challenge of postmodernism: Defending the discipline. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

  • Jessop, B. (2001). Bringing the state back in (yet again): Reviews, revisions, rejections, and redirections. International Review of Sociology, 11(2), 149–173.

  • Kalyvas, A. (2002). The stateless theory: Poulantzas’s challenge to postmodernism. In S. Aronowitz & P. Bratsis (Eds.), Paradigm lost (pp. 105–142). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Keohane, R. (1988). International institutions: Two approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 379–396.

  • Klein, B. (1994). Strategic studies and world order. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Krishna, S. (1993). The importance of being ironic: A postcolonial view on critical international relations theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 18, 385–417.

  • Lapid, Y. (1989). The third debate: On the prospects of international theory in a post-positivist era. International Studies Quarterly, 33(3), 235–254.

  • Lawler, P. (2008). Ethics of postmodernism. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (pp. 378–389). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Lisle, D. (2012). The global politics of contemporary travel writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lobo-Guerrero, L. (2011). Insuring security: Biopolitics, security and risk. London: Routledge.

  • Lundborg, T. (2012). Politics of the event: Time, movement, becoming. London: Routledge.

  • Lundborg, T., & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2015). New materialisms, discourse analysis, and international relations: A radical intertextual approach. Review of International Studies, 41, 3–25.

  • McCarthy, D. R. (Ed.). (2018). Technology and world politics: An introduction. New York: Routledge.

  • Mitchell, A. (2014). Only human? A worldly approach to security. Security Dialogue, 45(1), 5–21.

  • Mitchell, T. (1991). The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics. American Political Science Review, 85(1), 77–96.

  • Mitchell, T. (2002). Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Newman, S. (2010). Power and politics in poststructuralist thought. London: Routledge.

  • Odysseos, L. (2007). The subject of coexistence: Otherness in international relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Opondo, S., & Shapiro, M. (Eds.). (2011). The new violent cartography: Geo-analysis after the aesthetic turn. London: Routledge.

  • Østerud, Ø. (1996). Antinomies of postmodernism in international studies. Journal of Peace Research, 33(4), 385–390.

  • Paipais, V. (2017). Political ontology and international political thought: Voiding a pluralist world. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Patomäki, H. (1997). The rhetorical strategies and the misleading nature of attacks on “postmodernism”: A reply to Osterud. Journal of Peace Research, 34(3), 325–329.

  • Peters, M. A. (2001). Poststructuralism, Marxism, and neoliberalism: Between theory and politics. Boston: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Peterson, S. V. (2006). Getting real: The necessity of critical poststructuralism in global political economy. In M. DeGoede (Ed.), International political economy and poststructural politics (pp. 119–138). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Polat, N. (1998). Poststructuralism, absence, mimesis: Making difference, reproducing sovereignty. European Journal of International Relations, 4(4), 447–477.

  • Price, R. (Ed.). (2008). Moral limit and possibility in world politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Reid, J. (2006). The biopolitics of the war on terror: Life struggles, liberal modernity, and the defence of logistical societies. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

  • Reid, J. (2014). Climate, migration, and sex: The biopolitics of climate-induced migration. Critical Studies on Security, 2(2), 196–209.

    (Video) Post Modernism and Critical Theory in International Relations (in English)

  • Rengger, N., & Thirkell-White, B. (2007). Still critical after all these years? The past, the present and the future of critical theory in international relations. Review of International Studies, 33, 3–24.

  • Sajed, A. (2012). The post always rings twice? The Algerian war, poststructuralism and the postcolonial in IR theory. Review of International Studies, 38, 141–163.

  • Sarup, M. (1993). An introductory guide to post-structuralism and postmodernism. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

  • Shapiro, M. (1989). Textualizing global politics. In J. Der Derian & M. J. Shapiro (Eds.), International/intertextual relations: Postmodern readings of world politics (pp. 11–22). New York: Lexington Books.

  • Shapiro, M. (1992). Reading the postmodern polity: Political theory as textual practice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Shapiro, M. (2009). Cinematic geopolitics. London: Routledge.

  • Shapiro, M. (2010). Time of the city: Politics, philosophy and genre. London: Routledge.

  • Shapiro, M. (2013). Studies in trans-disciplinary method. London: Routledge.

  • Smith, S. (1996). Positivism and beyond. In S. Smith, K. Booth, & M. Zalewski (Eds.), International theory: Positivism and beyond (pp. 11–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Smith, S. (2004). Singing our world into existence: International relations theory and September 11. International Studies Quarterly, 48, 499–515.

  • Steans, J., Pettiford, L., Diez, T., & El-Anis, I. (2005). An introduction to international relations theory: Perspectives and themes. Harlow, UK: Longman.

  • Steele, B. (2013). Alternative accountabilities in global politics. London: Routledge.

  • Storper, M. (2001). The poverty of radical theory today: From the false promise of Marxism to the mirage of the cultural turn. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(1), 155–179.

  • Sylvester, C. (2009). Art/museums: International relations where we least expect it. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

  • Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe, and Zizek. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Vaughan-Williams, N. (2009). Border politics: The limits of sovereign power. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  • Wæver, O. (1996). The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. In S. Smith, K. Booth, & M. Zalewski (Eds.), International theory: Positivism and beyond (pp. 149–185). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wæver, O. (2002). Identity, communities and foreign policy: Discourse analysis as foreign policy theory. In L. Hansen & O. Wæver (Eds.), European integration and national identity: The challenge of the Nordic states (pp. 20–49). London: Routledge.

  • Walker, R. B. J. (1995). Inside/outside: International relations as political theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Walt, S.M. (1991). The renaissance of security studies. International Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 211–239.

  • Weber, C. (1994). Simulating sovereignty: Intervention, the state and symbolic exchange. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • White, S. K. (1997). Weak ontology and liberal political reflection. Political Theory, 25(4), 502–523.

  • Whitehall, G. (2006). Musical modulations of political thought. Theory and Event, 9(3).

  • Wyn Jones, R. (Ed.). (2001). Critical theory and world politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

  • Zehfuss, M. (2007). Subjectivity and vulnerability: On the war with Iraq. International Politics, 44(1), 58–71.

  • Zehfuss, M. (2009). Poststructuralism. In P. Hayden (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to ethics and international relations (pp. 97–111). Surrey, UK: Ashgate.

  • Zehfuss, M. (2013). Critical theory, poststructuralism, and postcolonialism. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations. Los Angeles: SAGE.

  • Žižek, S. (1999). The ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. London: Verso.

    (Video) Poststructuralism - Research Paradigm

FAQs

What is poststructuralism and postmodernism? ›

Post structuralism is basically a language based theory or as Lane (2013) opines, "a hybrid discourse that usually incorporates deconstructive ideas into a wider field of enquiry"(p. 73) whereas postmodernism is way of looking at things, a condition of the mind and a way of life.

What is postmodernism theory in international relations? ›

Postmodernism theory of international relations argues that there is no objective reality in the world, everything involving human beings is subjective in nature.

What is post structuralism in IR theory? ›

Post-structuralism is a term for philosophical and literary forms of theory that both build upon and reject ideas established by structuralism, the intellectual project that preceded it.

What is structuralism theory in international relations? ›

Structuralism, Theories of

Structures are defined as the patterns and forms of social relations and combinations among a set of constituent social elements or component parts such as positions, units, levels, regions and locations, and social formations.

Is poststructuralism a part of postmodernism? ›

Post-structuralism is intertwined with postmodern thought and is one of many intellectual traditions working to dismantle the metanarrative of Western historiography.

What is the poststructuralist and postmodern discourse theory? ›

The focus of postmodern, poststructural theory is for modem, structural research to reconceptualize itself towards acknowledgement of its assumptions, towards reflecting them inward, and towards consistency with those assumptions. Being postmodern indicates a historical, sociological point of view.

What are the 5 characteristics of postmodernism? ›

5 Characteristics of Postmodern Literature
  • Embrace of randomness. Postmodern works reject the idea of absolute meaning and instead embrace randomness and disorder. ...
  • Playfulness. ...
  • Fragmentation. ...
  • Metafiction. ...
  • Intertextuality.
7 Jun 2021

What is the main idea of postmodernism? ›

Many postmodernists hold one or more of the following views: (1) there is no objective reality; (2) there is no scientific or historical truth (objective truth); (3) science and technology (and even reason and logic) are not vehicles of human progress but suspect instruments of established power; (4) reason and logic ...

What are examples of postmodernism? ›

Postmodern movies aim to subvert highly-regarded expectations, which can be in the form of blending genres or messing with the narrative nature of a film. For example, Pulp Fiction is a Postmodern film for the way it tells the story out of the ordinary, upending our expectations of film structure.

What is an example of post-structuralism? ›

They think truth is up for debate: your truth and my truth may be completely different. To use a simple example: a Hindu and a Christian have fundamentally different ideas about whose god is real. These two people have different ideas about the 'truth'.

How has post-structuralism troubled IR theory? ›

Poststructuralists offered a critical lens to the realm of IR in two essential aspects. Firstly, they criticised how most of governments conducted their foreign actions. Secondly, they focused on methods traditional IR theories gave us to understand actions taken by states.

What is post-structuralism in simple words? ›

Definition of post-structuralism

: a movement or theory (such as deconstruction) that views the descriptive premise of structuralism as contradicted by reliance on borrowed concepts or differential terms and categories and sees inquiry as inevitably shaped by discursive and interpretive practices.

What are the 3 main IR theories? ›

The three most prominent schools of thought are realism, liberalism and constructivism.

Who is the father of structuralism? ›

structuralism, in psychology, a systematic movement founded in Germany by Wilhelm Wundt and mainly identified with Edward B. Titchener.

What are the major theories of international relations? ›

The five main theories of international relations include: realism theory, liberalism theory, Marxism theory, constructivism theory, and feminism theory.

What are the characteristics of post-structuralism? ›

Post-structuralism rejects the idea of a literary text having a single purpose, a single meaning or one singular existence. Instead, every individual reader creates a new and individual purpose, meaning, and existence for a given text.

What is difference between poststructuralism and structuralism? ›

Structuralists emphasized the idea that truth and reality were to be identified within the structure. Post-Structuralism, on the other hand, criticized this foundation of structuralism. According to Post-Structuralism, there were no realities or truths; all such elements have to be understood as constructions.

What came after post-structuralism? ›

After the end of poststructuralism and the subsequent reorganization of knowledge that has taken place in recent years, two new factions have emerged. First are the Reticular Empiricists formed mostly by followers of Deleuze (along with Whitehead as well), and flanked by a formidable army of Latourians.

Which of the following is a thinker of poststructuralism and postmodernism? ›

Jacques Derrida

He is one of the major figures associated with post-structuralism and postmodern philosophy.

What are the limitations of post structuralism? ›

While the potentials of poststructuralism and social constructionism as an analytical complex seem to be the endeavor for relentless critique, the limitations are the 'empty subject' and the avoidance of any kind of normativity that leave no guidance for practice.

What do post structuralists believe? ›

Post-structuralists believe that language is key when seeking to explain the social world. They argue that there is no reality external to the language we use.

What is a simple definition of postmodernism? ›

Postmodernism is best understood as a questioning of the ideas and values associated with a form of modernism that believes in progress and innovation. Modernism insists on a clear divide between art and popular culture. But like modernism, postmodernism does not designate any one style of art or culture.

Who created postmodernism? ›

“Postmodernism” was a term coined by Arnold Toynbee (1889-1975) early in the century to refer to the last quarter of the 19th century, a time where capitalism and imperialism and Western civilization in general began to decline.

What influenced postmodernism? ›

Modernist artists experimented with form, technique and processes rather than focusing on subjects, believing they could find a way of purely reflecting the modern world. While modernism was based on idealism and reason, postmodernism was born of scepticism and a suspicion of reason.

What are the weaknesses of postmodernism? ›

Postmodernism had flaws from the beginning (as do all aesthetic theories.) For one thing, conceptions of “high and low” culture (and music) are not very descriptive. They are vague, create confusion, and provoke unnecessary ideological tension.

When did postmodernism begin and end? ›

Postmodernism is one of the most controversial movements in art and design history. Over two decades, from about 1970 to 1990, Postmodernism shattered established ideas about art and design, bringing a new self-awareness about style itself.

What is the difference between modernism and postmodernism? ›

The main difference between modernism and postmodernism is that modernism is characterized by the radical break from the traditional forms of prose and verse whereas postmodernism is characterized by the self-conscious use of earlier styles and conventions.

What replaced postmodernism? ›

Metamodernism is the cultural code that comes after postmodernism.

What is post Modern society? ›

Postmodernity (post-modernity or the postmodern condition) is the economic or cultural state or condition of society which is said to exist after modernity.

Is postmodernism still relevant today? ›

Indeed in the previous decades before us, postmodernism was in vogue in the academic settings of our country and in the Western world. It's not necessarily that way today. You still find it in literary departments. You still find it, unfortunately, sometimes in theology departments.

Who are the major proponents of post-structuralism? ›

Key figures include Foucault, Žižek, and Derrida, who is the most celebrated proponent of post-structuralist thought.

What are the criticisms of post-structuralism? ›

A common criticism of poststructuralism is that it does very little to propose solutions (Hanson, 2017). However, its usefulness really lies in its reflectivity and inquiry into unquestioned truths, and the meanings that have been applied to key notions of security by leading theories in the positivist tradition.

What influenced Poststructuralism? ›

Poststructuralism inherits the sceptical nature of philosophy that undercuts and questions commonsensical notions and assumptions. The stalwart of poststructuralism, Derrida, himself a philosopher, has been immensely influenced by iconoclastic philosopher of 19th century, like Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Freud.

Is Poststructuralism a useful IR theory What about its relationship to historical materialism? ›

Poststructuralists, not least by opening up their own work to the spectre of Marx, can help sensitise historical materialists to the semiotic dimension of life and encourage them to appropriate tools from the poststructuralist toolbox.

When did post-structuralism start? ›

Post-structuralism is an intellectual movement that emerged in philosophy and the humanities in the 1960s and 1970s. It challenged the tenets of structuralism, which had previously held sway over the interpretation of language and texts in the humanities and the study of economies and cultures in the social sciences.

What is the major concern of IR theory? ›

The two major theories of international relations are realism and liberalism. Most theories of international relations are based on the idea that states always act in accordance with their national interest, or the interests of that particular state.

What are the main assumptions of post-structuralism? ›

Some of the key assumptions underlying Post-Structuralism include: The concept of "self" as a singular and coherent entity is a fictional construct, and an individual rather comprises conflicting tensions and knowledge claims (e.g. gender, class, profession, etc).

Which international relations theory is best? ›

The realist theory concentrates on few major assumptions and uses those to better cope with international politics, which is certainly an advantage over other theories when describing today's world.

What are the types of international relations? ›

International relations features different types of scholarship. These types are metaphor, history, theory, engineering, and pattern recognition.

What is difference between realism and liberalism? ›

While realism is taken to portray pessimism in the relations between states in the international system, liberalism depicts optimism and positivism in as far as the relations and goals of states in the international system are concerned. Realism depicts competition in the relations between states.

What is a real world example of structuralism? ›

Examples of Structuralism

An apple is crisp, sweet, juicy, round, and hard. Another example of structuralism is describing your experience at the ocean by saying it is windy, salty, and cold, but rejuvenating. Another example of understanding sign–signifier is when someone says the word “tree”.

What are the four foundational concepts of structuralism? ›

There are four main common ideas underlying Structuralism as a general movement: firstly, every system has a structure; secondly, the structure is what determines the position of each element of a whole; thirdly, "structural laws" deal with coexistence rather than changes; and fourthly, structures are the "real things" ...

What is the basic aim of structuralism? ›

The main goal of Structuralism is to provide researchers with a kind of universal tool and approach that can be used in many scientific fields and in many domains of life. Jacques Derrida and Roland Barthes researched and used structuralist principles in different scientific fields, but particularly in literature.

What are the elements of international relations? ›

Analysis of the basic historical, geographical, economic, ideological and strategic factors that underlie and condition conflict and cooperation among actors in the contemporary international system.

What are the tools of international relations? ›

These include political, economic, military, and cultural instruments. Political instruments include diplomacy, propaganda, summitry and conferences, alliances, treaties. Diplomacy encompasses most if not all of these instruments.

Why realism is the most dominant theory in international relations? ›

Realism also captures varies dimensions existing in international politics. It also gives an account of how these politics have been influenced and changed over time. This has played a significant role in helping different people as well as groups to construe individual's politics in relation to international politics.

What is meant by postmodernism? ›

postmodernism, also spelled post-modernism, in Western philosophy, a late 20th-century movement characterized by broad skepticism, subjectivism, or relativism; a general suspicion of reason; and an acute sensitivity to the role of ideology in asserting and maintaining political and economic power.

What is difference between structuralism and poststructuralism? ›

Structuralism is a theoretical approach that identifies patterns in social arrangements, mostly notably language. While poststructuralism builds on the insights of structuralism, it holds all meaning to be fluid rather than universal and predictable.

What is the difference between postmodernism and modernism? ›

Main Difference – Modernism vs Postmodernism

The main difference between modernism and postmodernism is that modernism is characterized by the radical break from the traditional forms of prose and verse whereas postmodernism is characterized by the self-conscious use of earlier styles and conventions.

What is the name of the concept that establish an association between poststructuralism and postmodernism? ›

The most influential of all the Postmodernist / Post-Structuralist theories is deconstruction, propounded by Jacques Derrida. He is the single most influential intellectual in current philosophy and Anglo-American literary theory.

What are the 5 characteristics of postmodernism? ›

5 Characteristics of Postmodern Literature
  • Embrace of randomness. Postmodern works reject the idea of absolute meaning and instead embrace randomness and disorder. ...
  • Playfulness. ...
  • Fragmentation. ...
  • Metafiction. ...
  • Intertextuality.
7 Jun 2021

Who is the father of post modernism? ›

FOLLOWING the great American modernist poets of the first decades of the 20th century -- Pound, Eliot, Williams -- Charles Olson is the father of the "postmodernists" of the second half of the century, bridging Pound & Co. to such major poets as Robert Duncan and Robert Creeley.

What is example of postmodernism? ›

Postmodern movies aim to subvert highly-regarded expectations, which can be in the form of blending genres or messing with the narrative nature of a film. For example, Pulp Fiction is a Postmodern film for the way it tells the story out of the ordinary, upending our expectations of film structure.

What is an example of post-structuralism? ›

They think truth is up for debate: your truth and my truth may be completely different. To use a simple example: a Hindu and a Christian have fundamentally different ideas about whose god is real. These two people have different ideas about the 'truth'.

Who created Poststructuralism? ›

Post-structuralism is a late-twentieth-century development in philosophy and literary theory, particularly associated with the work of Jacques Derrida and his followers.

What influenced Poststructuralism? ›

Poststructuralism inherits the sceptical nature of philosophy that undercuts and questions commonsensical notions and assumptions. The stalwart of poststructuralism, Derrida, himself a philosopher, has been immensely influenced by iconoclastic philosopher of 19th century, like Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Freud.

Who distinguishes between post-modernism and postmodernism? ›

Comparison of Modernism and Postmodernism
ModernismPostmodernism
Unreliable narratorIronic narrator
Rejection of realismAmbivalence towards realism
Literature is self-containedLiterature is open and intertextual
High-brow genresMixing of high- and low-brow genres
7 more rows
5 Jul 2022

What is a major influence on postmodernism? ›

Postmodern artists, writers, and philosophers who were open to questioning socially constructed identities challenged preconceived notions of sexuality and gender and inspired widespread change. Technology: Technology has directly influenced two major themes of the Postmodern Period: digitalization and globalization.

What was postmodernism influenced by? ›

Both modernism and postmodernism were strongly influenced in their spirit by the Enlightenment. Through the Enlightenment, science and reason had triumphed over tradition and faith. Furthermore, the advancing industrialization brought with it an untiring belief in progress.

What are the characteristics of post-structuralism? ›

Post-structuralism rejects the idea of a literary text having a single purpose, a single meaning or one singular existence. Instead, every individual reader creates a new and individual purpose, meaning, and existence for a given text.

Which of the following is a thinker of poststructuralism and postmodernism? ›

Jacques Derrida

He is one of the major figures associated with post-structuralism and postmodern philosophy.

Is Foucault a postmodernist or poststructuralist? ›

Michel Foucault was a postmodernist though he refused to be so in his works. He defined postmodernity with reference to two guiding concepts: discourse and power.

Videos

1. POST-MODERNISM | IR LECTURE SERIES | LEARN TO LEAD
(Learn to Lead with Ayesha)
2. 80;24 IR@SR Poststructuralism and Postmodernism in International Relations ; All you Need to Know
(UPSC Preparation)
3. Postmodernism and Post-structuralism |Noam Chomsky
(Free Will)
4. What is Poststructuralism? (See link below for "What is Structuralism?")
(PHILO-notes)
5. 10 Poststructuralism
(Gerard van der Ree)
6. Explainer: Post-Structuralism
(Pat Norman)

You might also like

Latest Posts

Article information

Author: Frankie Dare

Last Updated: 11/21/2022

Views: 6571

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (73 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Frankie Dare

Birthday: 2000-01-27

Address: Suite 313 45115 Caridad Freeway, Port Barabaraville, MS 66713

Phone: +3769542039359

Job: Sales Manager

Hobby: Baton twirling, Stand-up comedy, Leather crafting, Rugby, tabletop games, Jigsaw puzzles, Air sports

Introduction: My name is Frankie Dare, I am a funny, beautiful, proud, fair, pleasant, cheerful, enthusiastic person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.